An intellectual avant-garde imposing personal freedom


By Serge Kreutz


Imposed freedom has a long history.

Plato considered rule by philosophers who imposed their wise decisions upon citizens way superior to democracy.

During the age of enlightenment in Europe, civil liberties were, in many cases, not taken by those who later enjoyed them, but granted by rulers who were influenced by philosophers.

After World War II, constitutions were imposed on Germany and Japan which embedded a high degree of personal freedom.

On the other hand, there has been a definite trend over the past few decades for democratic political systems to curtail the personal freedom of those ruled.

The fault is with democracy itself. Voters, once they have gained self-confidence, are always more likely to express negative, rather than positive sentiments in elections.

More freedom will not be achieved anytime soon by giving a majority of people with limited intellectual capacities ever more power over the political fate of a country.

That an intellectual avant-garde, elected or not, imposes freedom is a much more distinct possibility than more personal freedom resulting from ever more democracy.

If the intellectual avant-garde is in power only for a limited period of time, then its legacy should be a constitution that strongly limits the power of subsequent parliaments and governments to curtail the freedom of those ruled.


More on buteashop.com:

Why you need the butea superba / tongkat ali Libido Formula

Reining in male sexuality

An intellectual avant-garde imposing personal freedom

Moral-values philosophy




Products

Related articles





PT Sumatra Pasak Bumi
7th floor, Forum Nine, Jl. Imam Bonjol No.9,
Petisah Tengah, Medan Petisah,
Medan City, North Sumatra 20236,
Indonesia
Tel: +62-813 800 800 20


Disclaimer: Statements on this page have not undergone the FDA approval process.


About us - Contact us - buteashop.com/an-intellectual-avant-garde-imposing-personal-freedom.htm - Privacy policy